FundLabs connects supported claims to verifiable literature and flags what still needs your input instead of inventing facts. Every supported claim links to a source. Unconfirmed details are flagged, not invented.
A structured starting point with aims, evidence, and scientific decisions that still need confirmation.
From evidence discovery to reviewer-ready narrative, FundLabs keeps every claim grounded and every section aligned to funder requirements.
Funder names identify supported application contexts and do not imply endorsement.
Move from discovery to citation across the scholarly sources researchers already rely on.
Availability, speed, and returned fields vary by source.
Biomedical literature
Cross-disciplinary discovery
DOI and citation metadata
Open research preprints

Life sciences preprints

Health sciences preprints
Start with the context you have. FundLabs creates a proposal starter, keeps evidence and open questions visible, and lets you decide what enters the document.
Describe the research direction or bring a draft, figures, or supporting files. A topic alone is enough to begin.
Tell me what you study or what you are applying for.
FundLabs organizes the project in chat, links grounded sources, and marks unconfirmed decisions as assumptions. Refine the starter or add it when it is useful.
A focused rationale and staged validation path, with unconfirmed decisions kept visible for the investigator.
Edit beside your reference pool and AI assistant. Run focused review checks, inspect each finding, and decide which changes enter the proposal.
Contemporary biological frameworks show that molecular pathology can be measured during the preclinical phase [1].
Blood-based phosphorylated tau markers identify underlying pathology with high accuracy [2].
Need: validation cohortGeneral AI gives you text. FundLabs gives every claim a place, a source, and a review path.
See the grounded workflow →Context lives inside the current conversation.
Figures, aims, and hypotheses stay with one project so you can continue without rebuilding the context.
Claims and references must be checked in another tool.
Open the supporting passage beside the draft and inspect the evidence before a citation enters the proposal.
The draft and the funding call drift into separate workflows.
Funding requirements remain visible while each section stays aligned to the call, review criteria, and constraints.
The reason for the change is easy to lose.
See the location and rationale, then apply or reject the change. You remain the final decision-maker.
Start with a real proposal, then choose the capacity you need. Paid plans add monthly credits for literature search, drafting, review, revision, and export.
You can begin with a research topic, rough aims, figures, an RFP, or an existing proposal draft. More detail improves specificity, but it is not a prerequisite for seeing a useful starter.
Supported scientific claims are connected to inspectable literature sources. When an important project detail is unknown, FundLabs marks it for your input instead of presenting an invented detail as fact.
No. FundLabs helps researchers build, review, cite, revise, and export proposal materials. The researcher remains responsible for scientific judgment and submission.
FundLabs prioritizes NIH and NSF workflows and supports additional research funding contexts including UKRI, ERC, Horizon Europe, NSFC, and other funders when the relevant requirements are available.
Start with the context you have. Keep sources, assumptions, requirements, and revisions visible as the proposal takes shape.